![]() You are going to require ten times the storage, and the video will take far longer to work with. ![]() For the task you are describing, it is a complete and total waste of time and money. If you do cuts-only on that video in Vegas, it will not disturb or change one pixel of your video and again, when you output to DV, the resulting video will be not just as good as the original, it will BE IDENTICAL to the original video.įinally, there is no improvement in quality that you gain by rendering to uncompressed AVI. The quality captured on that tape is transferred - exactly - to your computer. Well, when you capture a DV tape, you are simply copying the bits from the tape. His request is not logical, and you need to talk him out of his request. However, I think you need to understand what musicvid and ushere were trying to tell you, namely that your client really doesn't know what he is asking for. ![]() The DV video which you capture from your camera consumes about 13 GB/hour, or less than 1/10 that amount. ![]() The answer is that 720x480 uncompressed video consumes 2.36 GB/minute which, if you multiply by 60, equals 142 GB/hour.įeel free to use Google to verify these numbers The basic question is easy to answer by just using Google OR by rendering one minute of 720x480 video to an uncompressed file and then multiplying by 60.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |